Most couples spend years preparing for retirement together.
They save. They make Social Security decisions. They may have pensions, retirement accounts, annuities, life insurance, Medicare coverage, and an investment strategy. Eventually, all of those pieces become the income that supports their retirement.
But there is another question every married couple should be able to answer:
What happens to that income when the first one of us dies?
It is not a pleasant question. It is also not one that should wait until there is a surviving spouse trying to answer it alone.
Because when one spouse dies, the household does not simply become a smaller version of what it was before. Some income stops. Some continues. Some changes. New money may become available. Taxes change. Medicare costs can change. Accounts change ownership. And the person left behind may have to make important, often permanent, financial decisions at one of the most difficult times of his or her life.
A retirement income plan should account for that transition before it happens.
One Principle Runs Through All of This
Before we look at the individual pieces, understand the single idea that ties them together.
Many of the decisions that determine a surviving spouse’s income cannot be changed once you know which spouse died first.
The pension survivor election is made when the pension begins. The annuity payout structure is chosen when the contract is set up. Life insurance depends on age and health at the time you apply. By the time there is a surviving spouse, most of these choices are already locked in.
That is why survivor planning is not something the surviving spouse does after the fact. It is something the couple does together, while both are still here to decide.
Start With Four Questions
Take every source of income and protection in your retirement plan and ask:
What stops?
What continues?
What changes?
What becomes available?
The answers may be very different depending on the source. That is why looking only at your total household income today can give you an incomplete picture of retirement security.
Social Security: Two Checks Can Become One
For many married couples, Social Security provides two monthly payments while both spouses are alive. After the first death, that changes.
A surviving spouse may be eligible for a survivor benefit based on the deceased spouse’s work record. But Social Security generally does not continue both retirement benefits for the surviving spouse. In most cases the survivor keeps the larger of the two checks and the smaller one goes away.
That means a household receiving two Social Security payments can find itself living on one. How much remains depends on the couple’s individual benefits, claiming decisions, ages, and survivor-benefit rules.
That is one reason a Social Security claiming decision is not necessarily an individual decision. The higher earner’s claiming decision can affect the income available to the surviving spouse years later.
We discussed those decisions in more detail in Your Social Security Decision Is Really an Income Decision.
What Happens to the Pension?
If either spouse has a pension, the next question is simple: what happens to it at death?
Some pensions provide continuing income to a surviving spouse. The amount may depend on the survivor option selected when the pension began. Other elections may provide more income while both spouses are alive but less, or nothing, after the pension recipient dies.
The important time to understand that tradeoff is not after the pension recipient dies. It is when the pension election is being made.
A pension that looks like $3,000 of dependable monthly income today may not be $3,000 of income for the surviving spouse. The retirement plan needs to reflect what actually survives.
An Annuity Depends on How It Was Structured
The same principle applies to annuities. It is not enough to say, “We have guaranteed income.”
You need to know what happens to that income, or to the remaining contract value, when one spouse dies.
Depending on the type of annuity, the contract, and the elections made, income may continue for a surviving spouse. A remaining contract value or death benefit may pass to a beneficiary. Payments may continue for a guaranteed period. Or income may stop at death.
A life-only income option, for example, may provide income for one person’s lifetime and then end. A joint-and-survivor structure is designed differently because it considers two lives. Neither structure is automatically right or wrong. The question is whether the structure matches what the household needs.
That decision becomes especially important when guaranteed income is part of the household’s income floor. If an income source disappears at the first death, the surviving spouse’s income floor may be very different from the one the couple had together.
The Survivor’s Tax Squeeze
Here is where several of these pieces collide, and it is the part couples most often miss.
When the first spouse dies, income usually falls. One Social Security check goes away. A pension may shrink. But the income that remains does not get taxed the way it used to.
The surviving spouse eventually moves from married filing jointly to single filing status. The single brackets are roughly half as wide as the joint brackets, and the standard deduction is smaller. So the same dollar of income can land in a higher bracket than it did when both spouses were living.
Put those two things together and you get the squeeze: income goes down, but the tax rate on what is left can go up.
Required minimum distributions can make this sharper. Retirement-account distributions may continue adding taxable income even after the survivor eventually moves into the narrower single-filer brackets.
For the year of death, a surviving spouse who otherwise qualifies may generally still file a joint federal return. A surviving spouse who has a qualifying dependent child, has not remarried, and pays more than half the cost of keeping up the home may be able to use qualifying surviving spouse status for up to the two years following the year of death, which keeps the joint brackets and standard deduction for that window. Most surviving spouses without a qualifying dependent child move to single filing status sooner.
The point is not to predict anyone’s future tax return. It is to recognize that the same household income can produce a very different tax result once two taxpayers filing jointly become one taxpayer filing alone. We looked more closely at how retirement income, RMDs, Social Security, and Medicare can interact in Taxes in Retirement: How to Keep More of Your Retirement Income. That belongs in the survivor-income conversation, with a qualified tax professional.
Medicare Costs May Need Another Look
Medicare premiums interact with all of this too.
Higher-income Medicare beneficiaries can pay income-related surcharges on Part B and Part D. Those amounts are generally based on tax-return information, so the same shift that raises a survivor’s tax bracket can also raise Medicare premiums.
A spouse’s death is one of the life-changing events that may let someone ask Social Security to reconsider an income-related Medicare premium adjustment when income has fallen. That is worth knowing, because it is one of the few places where the survivor can push back.
This is another reason survivor planning crosses professional lines. Retirement income, taxes, Social Security, and Medicare do not operate in separate boxes. A change in one affects the others.
Life Insurance Can Change the Equation
Life insurance works differently from the income sources above. It is not retirement income while both spouses are living. But at death it can introduce capital into the surviving spouse’s financial picture at exactly the time another source of income may be disappearing.
That money might replace lost income, eliminate debt, create another income source, preserve retirement assets, or simply give the surviving spouse time to make decisions without selling investments in a hurry.
This does not mean everyone approaching retirement needs more life insurance. Many households already have enough, or have other resources that do the same job. The right question is narrower: after the first death, is there an income gap, and if there is, does life insurance have a job to do in filling it?
If the answer is yes, timing matters. Life insurance generally becomes more expensive as you get older, and health matters. A person who waits may face higher premiums, less favorable underwriting, fewer options, or may no longer qualify at all. You can change many parts of a retirement plan later. You cannot go back and buy life insurance at your younger age and former health.
So the goal is not to buy coverage. It is to look at survivor-income needs while there is still time to decide whether coverage has a job to do and, if it does, whether it can be obtained on suitable terms.
The Household Expenses Do Not Get Cut in Half
This may be the easiest mistake to make. One spouse dies, so the household now supports one person instead of two.
But many expenses do not fall proportionately. The mortgage or housing costs remain. Property taxes remain. Homeowners insurance remains. Utilities do not disappear. A car may still be needed. Home maintenance continues. Healthcare continues. Food spending may decline, but not by half.
So the surviving spouse can experience something uncomfortable: income falls faster than expenses.
That is why survivor planning should look at the actual income and expenses expected after the first death, rather than assuming one person will need half as much money.
Retirement Accounts and Other Assets Do Not Disappear, But Their Job May Change
IRAs, 401(k)s, brokerage accounts, bank accounts, and other assets may remain after a spouse dies, but ownership, beneficiary treatment, distribution requirements, and tax considerations can change.
The surviving spouse may also suddenly need those assets to do a different job. An account that was intended for long-term growth or future discretionary spending may now be needed to replace income that disappeared. That can change withdrawal decisions and the amount of market risk the surviving spouse can comfortably accept.
Beneficiary designations matter here too. A plan can be carefully designed while both spouses are alive and still create unnecessary complications if beneficiary and ownership arrangements have not kept pace with it.
There Is Another Risk Couples Often Overlook
When one spouse dies, the survivor does not only lose income. The survivor may also lose a caregiver.
Many couples assume, consciously or not, that if one spouse eventually needs help, the other will provide at least some of that care. After the first death, that assumption disappears. The surviving spouse may eventually need to rely more heavily on children, paid home care, assisted living, or another form of long-term care.
That makes long-term-care planning part of survivor-income planning. The question is not simply whether the surviving spouse has enough income to live. It is whether the surviving spouse has enough resources, and the right plan, if living eventually includes needing care.
We explored that risk more fully in Your Retirement Plan Accounts for Living Longer. Does It Account for Needing Care?
This Is Why Retirement Planning Is a Team Sport
By now the pattern should be clear. The death of a spouse can touch Social Security, pensions, annuities, life insurance, investment and retirement accounts, taxes, Medicare, estate documents and beneficiary designations, and long-term care.
No single professional handles all of those areas. Your CPA may need to address the tax consequences. An attorney may need to address estate documents and ownership. An investment adviser may manage investment assets. An insurance professional may help evaluate life insurance, annuity, and long-term-care strategies.
The important thing is not collecting professionals. It is making sure the pieces work together. A couple can have good products, good accounts, and good professional relationships and still have a hole in the plan if nobody has asked what happens when the first spouse dies.
Run the Plan Twice, in Both Directions
There is a simple way to think about this. Run your retirement income plan once with both spouses alive. Then run it again after the first death.
And run it both ways, because the answer can be very different depending on which spouse dies first. When benefits, pensions, and health differ between the two, so does the picture the survivor is left with. Stress-testing only one direction can hide a gap that appears in the other.
Each time, ask:
What income disappears?
What income continues?
What changes?
What new resources become available?
What happens to taxes?
What happens to healthcare costs?
Does the surviving spouse still have enough dependable income to cover essential expenses? And if that spouse eventually needs care, where will the money and support come from?
You do not have to know which spouse will die first to answer those questions. In fact, by the time you know which spouse will die first, it is too late to plan for it.
That is why survivor planning belongs in the retirement plan while both spouses are still here to make the decisions together.
A retirement income plan should not only work for two lives.
It should have an answer for the life that continues after the first one ends.
If you found this helpful, subscribe to IUL.Solutions.
You’ll get new articles about retirement income, Social Security, annuities, long-term care, Medicare, life insurance and the decisions that can shape your retirement.
Subscribe on LinkedIn →Secure Future Life & Annuities Newsletter
By Kurtz Lytle